News

European Parliament’s Busy Wednesday: Democracy, Cyberbullying, and Maternity Leave on the Menu

The European Parliament kicked off Wednesday morning at 9:00 AM with what might be the political equivalent of a triple espresso: a debate on the Middle East crisis, complete with sky-high energy prices and fertilizer costs that would make any farmer weep. Cyprus’s Deputy Minister Marilena Raouna and Commission President Ursula von der Leyen tag-teamed the discussion, followed by an afternoon session on southern Lebanon’s humanitarian crisis.

But wait, there’s more! In a move that proves even European politics can occasionally enter the 21st century, MEPs voted at noon to let new and expectant mothers delegate their votes while taking up to three months before and six months after childbirth. Revolutionary? Maybe. Overdue? Absolutely.

Around 2:00 PM, the Parliament turned its attention to something we’ve all experienced or witnessed: cyberbullying. Commissioner Glen Micallef faced the music as MEPs grilled him on the Commission’s action plan. A resolution demanding criminal provisions and platform accountability is expected Thursday—because apparently, we still need to remind tech companies that being terrible to people online is, in fact, bad.

The afternoon got heavier with a 3:00 PM discussion on combating antisemitism, prompted by recent attacks in the Netherlands and Belgium. MEPs also squeezed in debates about not normalizing relations with Russia (featuring sports and cultural events), Sudan’s catastrophic humanitarian crisis, and urgent human rights violations in Haiti, China, and Venezuela.

In a delightfully meta moment, the Patriots for Europe group requested a “topical debate” at 1:00 PM about “Commission interference in democratic process and elections.” Nothing says democracy like debating whether you’re doing democracy right.

The noon voting marathon covered everything from budget discharge approvals to €2 million in support for Belgian workers laid off after Liberty Steel’s closure. MEPs also tackled emissions trading systems, dodgy non-EU e-commerce flooding the market with substandard products, and fundamental rights reports.

Just another Wednesday in Strasbourg, where saving democracy, protecting mothers, and fighting cyberbullies all happen before lunch.

EU Gives Developing Countries a Trade Hug (With Some Strings Attached)

The European Parliament just voted to keep the doors open for developing nations—at least when it comes to tariffs. With a solid 459-127 vote (and 70 MEPs apparently too confused to pick a side), they’ve renewed the Generalized System of Preferences for another decade.

What’s the Deal?

Think of it as the EU’s version of “shop here, pay less!” for 60-plus developing countries representing 2 billion people. These nations can now export goods to Europe with reduced or zero tariffs, because nothing says “we care” quite like waiving import duties.

The Fine Print (Because There’s Always Fine Print)

Want those sweet trade preferences? Better sign up for some human rights and environmental conventions. The Paris Agreement? Check. Convention on the Rights of the Child? You bet. It’s like a membership club, except instead of a gym you never use, you get access to European markets.

The Controversial Bits

Here’s where things get spicy. The EU wanted to link trade benefits to countries cooperating on taking back irregular migrants. Parliament basically said “hold on there, partner” and added enough bureaucratic hurdles to make this harder than assembling IKEA furniture blindfolded. Countries now get a 12-month engagement period before anything happens, and the least developed nations get a two-year grace period. Translation: this conditionality will be “very hard to trigger.”

Rice, Rice Baby

European rice producers were sweating bullets, so Parliament threw them a lifeline. If rice imports surge by 45% over a 10-year average, automatic safeguards kick in. It’s protectionism, but make it sound technical.

The Bottom Line

The EU gets to look magnanimous while protecting its own interests. Developing countries get market access with some homework assignments. And European rice farmers can sleep at night. Democracy in action, folks—messy, complicated, and somehow functional.

The rules kick in once the Council rubber-stamps everything, lasting until 2035. Mark your calendars.

EU Parliament Says “Yes Means Yes” – And It’s About Time

In a move that’s somehow both groundbreaking and “wait, this wasn’t already a thing?”, the European Parliament just voted overwhelmingly (447-160, with 43 abstentions) to demand that all EU countries define rape based on the absence of consent. Yes, you read that right – in 2026, we’re still having this conversation.

The Tuesday vote calls on the European Commission to propose legislation establishing that rape is, quite simply, sex without freely given, informed, and revocable consent. Revolutionary concept, right? Apparently so, since several EU countries still rely on force- or violence-based definitions that sound like they were written during the Middle Ages.

What Does This Actually Mean?

Parliament is making it crystal clear: silence isn’t consent. Not fighting back isn’t consent. Not saying “no” isn’t consent. Having said “yes” last Tuesday isn’t automatic consent for this Tuesday. And – brace yourself for this shocking revelation – being in a relationship with someone doesn’t equal permanent consent either.

The report also tackles the uncomfortable reality of trauma responses. You know, those pesky biological reactions like freezing or fawning that inconveniently don’t fit into outdated legal frameworks. MEPs want these reflected in both legislation and judicial practice, because apparently science should inform law. Wild idea.

The “Only Yes Means Yes” Movement Gains Steam

Swedish MEP Evin Incir didn’t mince words: “It is both morally and legally unacceptable that women are not protected by ‘only yes means yes’ legislation across the EU.” Since 2023, France, Finland, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands have joined the consent-based club. The momentum is building, though one might wonder what took so long.

Polish MEP Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus pointed out the grim statistics: one in three women in the EU has experienced gender-based violence, and one in twenty has been raped. Thanks to brave survivors like Gisèle Pelicot speaking out, the pressure for change is mounting.

Beyond Definitions: Actual Support

The Parliament isn’t just playing word games. They’re demanding a victim-centered approach including immediate medical care, trauma support, legal assistance, and 24-hour crisis centers. They also want mandatory training for everyone who might encounter rape victims – police, judges, prosecutors, healthcare workers – because apparently “understanding consent” shouldn’t be optional for professionals in these fields.

There’s even a call for EU-wide education on consent, relationships, and bodily autonomy, plus campaigns against “rape myths” and incel propaganda online. Because in 2026, we’re still fighting medieval attitudes with medieval persistence.

The Bottom Line

One in three women experiencing gender-based violence should be enough to make this a no-brainer. The fact that it took this long – and that 160 MEPs still voted against it – tells you everything you need to know about why this legislation is desperately needed.

The message is simple: consent isn’t complicated. It’s just that some people have been making it complicated for far too long.

EU’s 2027 Budget: More Money for Everything (Except Boring Stuff)

The European Parliament just voted on what they want in the 2027 budget, and spoiler alert: they want a lot. With 389 MEPs saying “yes please” and 191 saying “maybe not,” Parliament has laid out a shopping list that would make Santa nervous.

The Big Three: Jobs, Security, and Not Falling Apart

The budget priorities read like a greatest hits album of things people actually care about. Social cohesion? Check. Competitiveness? You bet. Security? Obviously – have you seen the neighborhood lately?

MEPs are pushing for cash to flow into critical infrastructure, housing (because apparently Europeans would like roofs over their heads), and healthcare systems that don’t collapse when someone sneezes. Revolutionary stuff.

Money, Money, Money (But Where’s It Coming From?)

Here’s where it gets spicy: Parliament wants to tackle labor shortages, fund startups, support farmers, protect borders, fight climate change, AND loan Ukraine €90 billion. Oh, and they’re worried about rising borrowing costs from that NextGenerationEU recovery fund eating into existing programs.

Their solution? “We need new revenue sources!” Translation: “We need more money to get all this money we’re spending.”

Democracy, Media, and Fighting the Trolls

In a refreshingly specific move, MEPs want funding for independent journalism and fighting disinformation. Because apparently, keeping democracy alive and stopping your uncle from sharing conspiracy theories both require EU budget lines.

They’re also big on the rule of law, insisting it applies to all EU funds. Imagine that – wanting rules to actually apply to everyone.

Eastern Borders Get Some Love

Budget rapporteur Nils Ušakovs made sure to highlight support for eastern border regions, noting they face “growing security and economic pressures.” That’s diplomatic speak for “things are tense over there.”

What Happens Next?

The Commission will present its actual budget proposal in June, probably after recovering from reading Parliament’s wish list. Then comes the fun part: negotiations with the Council, where member states will inevitably say “sounds great, but how about less?”

The final budget needs approval by year’s end, giving everyone plenty of time to argue about who gets what and why their priority is more important than everyone else’s.

In short: Parliament wants to fund everything good while avoiding anything bad, all without spending too much money they don’t have. Politics!

EU Parliament Wants More Money (Surprise!), But This Time They Have a Plan

The European Parliament just voted to supersize the EU’s next seven-year budget, because apparently, the Commission’s proposal was about as satisfying as a diet salad at a wedding buffet.

On Tuesday, MEPs decided the 2028-2034 budget should hit 1.27% of EU GNI—that’s roughly €1.78 trillion in today’s money, or about €175 billion more than what Brussels initially suggested. Think of it as the EU asking for a 10% raise, except instead of promising to work harder, they’re promising to work on everything.

What’s Getting the Cash?

The wish list reads like a European fever dream: defense, competitiveness, innovation, green transitions, digital stuff, infrastructure, health, education, culture, and—because someone remembered they exist—the outermost regions. Oh, and they’re doubling down on programs like Erasmus+ (so your kids can still get drunk in Prague on the EU’s dime) and Horizon Europe (actual science, not just party science).

But don’t worry, farmers and regional development fans—MEPs insist the Common Agricultural Policy and cohesion funds won’t be sacrificed at the altar of shiny new priorities. It’s like promising to buy a sports car while assuring your spouse you won’t sell the minivan.

The Fine Print (AKA The Boring But Important Bit)

Here’s where it gets spicy: Parliament wants to keep the €150 billion debt from the NextGenerationEU recovery fund outside the budget. That’s like saying “this credit card doesn’t count” when calculating your monthly expenses. Creative accounting? Maybe. But they’re calling it “fiscal responsibility.”

MEPs are also demanding new revenue sources—about €60 billion annually—through what they’re calling a “basket approach.” Translation: taxes on digital services, online gambling, crypto gains, and possibly your neighbor’s carbon footprint. If member states balk at some options, Parliament’s ready with backup plans like a parent threatening increasingly absurd punishments.

The Drama

The report passed 370-201, which in EU terms is basically a landslide. Now the ball’s in the member states’ court, where it will likely bounce around for months while everyone argues about who pays what.

MEPs are also throwing shade at the Commission’s “one plan per member state” idea, warning it could turn EU policy into an à la carte menu where everyone orders something different and nobody’s happy with what they get.

What Happens Next?

Parliament’s drawn its line in the sand. Now they wait for the European Council to either match their ambition or engage in the time-honored EU tradition of negotiating everything down to a compromise that leaves everyone equally disappointed.

Either way, grab your popcorn—budget negotiations are about to get interesting.

European Parliament Gets Down to Business (And Some Serious Remembrance)

The European Parliament kicked off its April 27-30 plenary session in Strasbourg with President Roberta Metsola at the helm, mixing somber commemorations with the kind of bureaucratic housekeeping that keeps the EU machine humming.

When Disasters Echo Through Decades

Metsola opened with a poignant reminder that it’s been 40 years since Chornobyl decided to have the world’s worst day ever. The nuclear disaster’s environmental and human fallout is still making itself known, proving that some hangovers last for generations. “Europe remembers, and Europe stands with you,” she declared, addressing communities still dealing with the consequences of that catastrophic April day in 1986.

Two Women, Too Much Courage

The President then turned attention to Iran, where Nobel Peace Prize winner Narges Mohammadi and Sakharov Prize laureate Nasrin Sotoudeh remain imprisoned for the crime of… being brave, basically. Metsola called them “two women of extraordinary courage” and demanded their immediate release, promising that Parliament “will always be a voice for those who have been silenced.” No pressure, Iran.

The Immunity Shuffle

In less inspiring news, Parliament is dealing with a flurry of immunity waiver requests. Six MEPs face votes on whether they can be prosecuted for various alleged misdeeds, while Greece, Hungary, and Poland have asked for immunity to be lifted from three others. It’s like a game of political hot potato, except with legal consequences.

Musical Chairs, MEP Edition

The session also saw the usual comings and goings: two MEPs out (including Anders Vistisen, who presumably had better things to do), three MEPs in. Democracy never sleeps, even if some parliamentarians occasionally do during debates.

The agenda was tweaked, negotiations were authorized, and deadlines were extended—because what’s the EU without a good deadline extension? The air passenger rights regulation got an extra two weeks to sort itself out, proving that even legislation sometimes needs a time-out.

Brussels Gets Busy: Parliament Tackles Consent, Crypto Bros, and Cash Protection

The European Parliament is gearing up for another action-packed week, and if you thought your Monday was hectic, try juggling rape legislation, TikTok financial gurus, and ocean diplomacy all before dinner.

Consent Isn’t Complicated (But Apparently It Needs Legislation)

Starting at 6 PM, MEPs will debate establishing a common EU-wide definition of rape based on freely given consent. Because apparently, in 2026, we still need to spell this out. The Civil Liberties and Women’s Rights Committees have prepared a report that’ll be voted on Tuesday, followed by a press conference where someone will inevitably have to explain why this wasn’t already a thing.

Finfluencers: When Your Financial Advisor Has 2 Million Followers and Zero Credentials

Around 8:30 PM, Parliament will tackle the wild world of “finfluencers” – those charming social media personalities teaching Gen Z about cryptocurrency between dance videos. With scams, hidden ads, and questionable investment advice running rampant, MEPs want minimum standards for financial education. Shocking concept: maybe teenagers shouldn’t get their retirement planning tips from someone whose main qualification is going viral.

The Money Stuff (Less Exciting, Still Important)

The day also includes discussions on protecting EU financial interests (because someone has to watch the piggy bank), the European Investment Bank’s annual report, and ocean diplomacy’s role in fishing competitiveness. Yes, ocean diplomacy is a real thing, and yes, it’s scheduled for 9 PM because nothing says “important maritime policy” like debating it when you’d rather be watching Netflix.

The press briefing kicks off at 4:30 PM for journalists brave enough to attend, with live streaming available for those who prefer their bureaucracy from the comfort of their pajamas.

EU Takes Another Swing at Taming the AI Beast (Spoiler: They’re Still Negotiating)

The European Parliament is back at it again, folks. On Wednesday, two MEPs—Arba Kokalari from Sweden and Michael McNamara from Ireland—will face the press to explain what happened during Tuesday’s marathon negotiating session on the EU’s AI rules. Yes, another round of talks. Because apparently, regulating artificial intelligence is slightly more complicated than assembling IKEA furniture.

The hot topic? The so-called “digital omnibus” package, which sounds like a futuristic bus but is actually a proposal to tweak the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act. Think of it as the “AI Act: The Patch Update” – now with more flexibility for companies, extra support for small businesses, and a few strategic delays on those pesky high-risk AI system rules.

Oh, and here’s the kicker: they’re likely banning “nudification” apps. Yes, that’s exactly what it sounds like—AI tools that digitally undress people without consent. The fact that this needed to be explicitly banned tells you everything about where we are as a civilization.

The negotiators are racing against the clock to finalize everything before August, which in EU terms is like trying to parallel park a semi-truck while blindfolded. The goal is to make life easier for businesses while still keeping AI from going full Skynet on us.

If you’re wondering why this matters: the EU’s AI Act is basically the world’s first comprehensive attempt to regulate artificial intelligence. Whatever they decide will ripple across global tech policy like a stone thrown into a very bureaucratic pond.

The press conference kicks off at 11:00 CEST in Strasbourg, complete with live streaming and interpretation in six languages—because nothing says “cutting-edge technology” like simultaneous translation services.

Stay tuned to see if European lawmakers can finally agree on how to keep our robot overlords in check before summer vacation.

EU Budget 2027: MEP Ready to Spill the Beans (or at Least the Numbers)

Mark your calendars, budget enthusiasts and political junkies! Tuesday at 13:30 CET, the European Parliament is rolling out the red carpet for what promises to be a riveting discussion about everyone’s favorite topic: money.

Nils Ušakovs, the Latvian MEP who drew the short straw (or perhaps the long budget spreadsheet?) as rapporteur for the 2027 EU budget, will be holding court in Strasbourg’s Daphne Caruana Galizia press conference room. Can’t make it in person? No worries—there’s a livestream, because nothing says “must-see TV” quite like budget guidelines.

The press conference follows Parliament’s vote on its spending priorities for 2027, which reportedly include social cohesion, competitiveness, and security. Translation: the usual suspects when it comes to divvying up the continental piggy bank.

For those brave journalists attempting to join remotely via the Interactio platform, fair warning: it only works on specific browsers and devices. Think of it as the EU’s way of testing your technical competence before you can question their fiscal competence. Pro tip: connect 30 minutes early, because nothing screams “professional journalist” like frantically troubleshooting your connection while the presser starts without you.

The event will feature interpretation in five languages, ensuring that questions about billions of euros can be asked—and possibly evaded—in multiple tongues. Headphones recommended for better sound quality, though whether that improves the clarity of budget-speak remains debatable.

So tune in Tuesday to discover how Europe plans to spend money it hasn’t collected yet. Democracy in action, folks!

EU Budget Talks Get Their Moment in the Spotlight (Yes, Really)

The European Parliament is rolling out the red carpet—or at least the press conference room—for what might be the most thrilling Tuesday afternoon event since someone discovered you could expense croissants: a briefing on the EU’s long-term budget.

Mark your calendars for 2:00 PM CET on April 28, 2026, when Parliament President Roberta Metsola and budget co-rapporteurs Siegfried Mureşan and Carla Tavares will discuss Parliament’s negotiating position on the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF). That’s bureaucrat-speak for “how the EU plans to spend its money from 2028 to 2034.”

The press conference follows a plenary vote on the Commission’s budget proposal, and if you’re wondering whether this is a big deal—well, they’re offering interpretation in six languages. That’s how you know Brussels means business.

For the tech-savvy journalist, the event will be available via Interactio, though users are warned to connect 30 minutes early for a “connection test.” Nothing says “important EU business” quite like troubleshooting your browser settings.

The event will take place in the Daphne Caruana Galizia press conference room, a reminder that even in the world of fiscal frameworks and budget allocations, some things matter more than spreadsheets.

Journalists hoping to attend are advised to bring headphones for better sound quality. Because if you’re going to spend your Tuesday afternoon discussing multi-year financial planning, you might as well hear every thrilling detail.